That would be the Fallacy of Single Cause.
The whole question of faith cannot be answered via logic. We state that bluntly. It's connected to what I posted on your blog today. That's why I say it boils down to epistemology; I refuse to be bound by the materialistic logic of Aristotle. I further refuse to debate faith and belief. But for those who can't let it rest, I offer the very well established academic references to ANE epistemology. As long as they refuse to explore that and account for it, there is no debate. Yes, faith and God's response always leaves plausible deniability to those who refuse to move outside the Aristotelian system. This is why I am comfortable with Phenomenology.
The whole question of faith cannot be answered via logic. We state that bluntly. It's connected to what I posted on your blog today. That's why I say it boils down to epistemology; I refuse to be bound by the materialistic logic of Aristotle. I further refuse to debate faith and belief. But for those who can't let it rest, I offer the very well established academic references to ANE epistemology. As long as they refuse to explore that and account for it, there is no debate. Yes, faith and God's response always leaves plausible deniability to those who refuse to move outside the Aristotelian system. This is why I am comfortable with Phenomenology.