06-01-2019, 10:10 AM
Listening now. Sheldrake does what so many other Western scholars do, which is fill in a lot of the Biblical narrative accounts with whatever philosophical filter they put on, and it's almost always a Western filter. Instead of giving voice to the "silent" parts properly by putting the cultural and philosophical meaning of what He did, and what the gospel writers wrote--the non-Talmudic, Hebrew approach that was always there but in a corporate minority in Israel at the time--Sheldrake just writes in what he wants.
He has some good observations about general human and animal behavior, but they don't really apply exactly to what Jesus did.
He has some good observations about general human and animal behavior, but they don't really apply exactly to what Jesus did.